The same is for humans, we don't learn on instinct level either.

Yes, it learns

Experience is unobservable

Yes, it can connect with other agents, see Hugging Face incident

In what way do you think it learns?

It can use new information when performing new tasks. It can store experience based on mistakes it made. It can store knowledge in several ways (context, files) and use it when needed.

There is a chance it will forget something, but the same can be said for humans.

so like a novel or a working paper? Or notes?

like a digital, nearly instantly accessible notes, with additional notes describing where other notes are and what they contain

You (as a human) don't need to prompt AI. Why do you think it is required?

This is false, unless you think the same for humans

Using JSON as a configuration format is a big mistake. JEP authors could learn a bit from package.json problems. Hope JSON will not be used in anything significant for JDK configuration.

Yeah - json is fine as a readable mechanical exchange format, but without comments it's essentially unusable for anything humans need to touch :/

I'm somewhat boggled that json5 hasn't grown to be more of a thing.

Lines are getting thinner closer to the center. This is not a gradient, but I understand what they meant. AI would use correct word for this.

Agreed, that point in the article is lacking any source. Big part of complexity of the implementation was introducing form attributes and behavior.

Slower than pages with HTML+CSS with tiny bit of JS. Much faster and leaner than current JS SPAs.

This is the right way to look at it. Anything with a ton of JS ads chewing up memory now is just as bad, or worse, than a ton of Flash ads were in the early 2000s. But Flash sites were, essentially, SPAs at the time. And they were far more performant than most JS SPAs are now (although a lot of that also has to do with React/Vue/etc. and how poorly-trained coders choose to deploy them).

Quite a lot of open source hardware is licensed under the BY-SA Creative Commons license which is an actual open source license. E.g. the Arduinos and things like the Milkymist One which can actually run linux.

What are you even trying to say? The fact that this is hardware isn't what makes it non-open source, there's plenty of open source hardware out there. The thing that makes it not-open-source is that the license is non-commercial.

If you can't legally use the product, the fact that the source is available is meaningless. CC-NC is a source available license, not an open source license.

A Raspberry Pi running any flavor of linux, right?